The Science of God

First, lets talk about the coherency of evidence for or against the Existence of God/(a)Diety/Dieties.

What could we call 'evidence'? We know Gravity exists because - actually it is just a word to label a thing we see! Its not that we 'see' Gravity itself - but things drop from up to down and to name that whatever does that we say: Gravity. It could though also be God! "Experts" may say though: Well, no, since its a Physical effect! But - if we say God is eternal, we have to take into account that He may in deed be doing those things in the accuracy of Physics - yea - that Physical effects are the work of God!

If there is a thing we say we cannot proof, we cannot disproof it either - and thus 'occams razor' can be applied both ways, depending on where the vast amount of your insight/philosophy/perception/insight/knowledge/->Interest<- resides the one or the other would be 'the plausible remainder' to you.
(Hence Occams Razor is a fools way to testify its own ignorance! Pardon me if I say so!)


Yea, there is no denieing that this world, "if" there is a God, was made 'for' the Unbeliever. But more than the things that are beyond our Horizon testify against God, the things that are within our Horizon testify for God!

---

Substance and Material

---

were to say: If we find a mysterious pillar of fire floating around nowhere - uhm, nope! There are already theories that discuss this phenomenon, and yea, we'd blame Aliens but Aliens are scientifically more plausible than God it seems.
(Actually their inexistence is the more unlikely thing!)

So would we need to find a substance that "is" God? Much more would we need to see something that requires us to define 'God' - pretty much like Gravity - and so we find 'Destiny' or 'Fate'. To the gnostic mind we can easily extend this: Replace 'God' by other terms; And see why that would be good! Eternity, Existence, Life, ... those are words that the Christian Gnostic 'knows' describe God.

So we can either take these things as evidence, or not! Destiny/Fate - are they even real?

Seriously, there are certain things that say: Yes! Prophetic Deams for instance. Or, as I would call it: "Fools Fate" - which is like a self-fulfilling prophecy just that the actors do all in their might to 'un'-fulfill it; And whether by doing so or on its own cannot revert the 'inevitable' from happening!

That we need something 'tangible' is an illusion! We don't need Gravity to be tangible! But the more I doubted its existence to you, the more you would crave for something tangible to make me see "what you see".


Emotions are tangible! They are tangible enough that some of us do base their whole entirety of existence on that! At least sometimes! How often "are we prone" to doing stupid things just because of some feeling?
The fear of believing could fall into the same category!
That takes us to denial - or how the believer would call the unbeliever out; No matter how much he/she claimed that he/she isn't afraid of believing!

---

Intelligent Design is ... what?

---

It is a synonym for "irrational belief" these days - but how come? Intelligent Design, to explain it without any Theological Thesis, is the observation of life as we know it corresponding to the concepts of 'Design' - implying an intelligent potency that governs the processes of appearance and all that. Even further we can go and say that Intelligent Design is a concept that exlains how life can be possible to begin with; So, that a certain configuration of elements (DNA) can unfold its 'magic'.
Is there no magic to it?
It is a simple observation to expand the horizon of 'seeing into' the idea/concept/theory/belief of Intelligent Design.

Such as: Male and Female - Single-Celled organisms feeding and multiplication - nurturer x nutrition polarity - eye and sight, ear and sound, tongue and taste, ... etc..

The Cosmos is "one big thing" - a Box if we so will within which everything "that can be" exists. Life as it is, as a part of it, is possible because of how the Cosmos works. Right?
So is life woven into the fabric of Existence - which is likewisely an idea leaning towards the concept of Intelligent Design!


There we're talking of 'biological life' - not 'existential existence'. Existential Existence takes us to the bare bones of our conscious understanding - where the least we know is the black-void within which our consciousness unfolds.
"We are" or "I am/You are" - and what you are has permission to exist through the body you are bound into.


Or is it: "Through the Body you are spawning from"?
Fact is: We can imagine life beyond biological bonds - and that imagination alone declares a transcending nature of the spirit.
Fact is: We don't use our conscious force to navigate the many biological processes of our body. We rely on a body that is grown from DNA and Proteins and whatever else belongs to it.


We can say; And get to a certainty that is difficult to defy; That our minds are governors of our bodies. Its no one-way road, nobody claims that! At least I don't ...! If my body gets hungry I'll see forward to feeding it. And if I pick right I might get a reward of good-taste from that!

Yet, at all, we may ask the simple scientific question: Whats the common denominator between Body and Mind?


Existence!?

If we had to find which is the "bigger"/more-significant part; Body (physics) or Mind (consciousness) - we have us a 'good loop'! If we say that consciousness spawns from physics, we say its the bigger, more complex part. The simplicity of consciousness however outrules the complexity of the brain that were the 'spawner'. So Existence(Mind>Body).

That way we get back to the Gnostic way of seeing it: Mind is capable of spawning physics (imagination) - at which point we need no further evidence; To at the very least set the mind upon the physics.
(Which doesn't remove us from the "shackles" of the body!)
(Sorry!)
(It doesn't! Really!!!)

(And it still doesn't!)
(Nope, no ascension from that alone!)
(Yea, it sucks - potentially - but hey, ... "it sucks" is already something!)


(It still sucks, doesn't it?)
(Anyway, it still ... doesn't redeem us)
(Yet!)
(Sorry, eh ... "Error! The [something] you seek is elsewhere!")


(And still! I really want you to understand that! Its - seriously!)
(Yea, seeriously!)

---

Hard to say?

---

Its simple: Whatever wired '(biological) life' into the Cosmos ... is ... a bigger "thing".

---

---

Furthermore, the mindbending critics might call out that this is just wordplay. But yea! 'Existence' is an intellectual concept, where 'intellectual' is a placeholder for "that which understands or does the understanding" (mind/"Protennoia"?). But mind is the place where we do our reasoning, as to finally decide whether God exists or not.
This decision is a product somewhere at a point of the process of reasoning.

So - physics aside - the big question of the Universe, where it came from, etc. can be simplified by realizing that/how Existence is paradox in and of itself (already).


There can be no existence from in-existence, therefore existence has to be an eternally given thing. So we can say that eternity equals absolution. Existence, however it 'exists', provides all that what ... yea ... exists! So we have a larger Existence, say: ETERNITY or EXISTENCE, and a lesser existence, say: What exists within EXISTENCE.
The relation is done in our minds, so, we can set our mind equal to EXISTENCE and what we hold on mind to existence.


The gap between 'human mind' and 'ETERNITY' is apparent as we think or speak about EXISTENCE in any way of looking at it, be it the Big Bang Theory or any other model of 'the Origin'. We get to the point that 'we cannot imagine beyond'. Its the final frontier - and what differentiates us from 'the BIG MIND'.

---