To accept is the Deliverance

Don't you think?

For me the time has long come; And if you're lucky it will pass you by; But I'm sick of ... words.
I realized that I'm hopelessly outnumbered or otherwise inferior to ... "whatever" ... words, words, words. I thought about, came to reflect about how, what, ... looking around the corners, trying to see what I can make out on the horizon - and yet, all of that didn't tell me what I wanted to know. What I wanted to know is finally here. The question reshaped anew.

"What is the truth?" - "The Truth is ..." - ... I'll put it this way: If you accept it, I will win!

This specific article here doesn't really add unto anything this site should be about, but still, it can be the one thing, the one thing that changes everything. If you accept it. And thats the weird thing ... "that thing".
To meet the cliche, I should try to make you accept something I want. Because ... well, thats what 'power' is. If I don't have power, I cannot be the one. Aren't those the merits I'm judged by?
Well - of course this makes "no sense" - and 'the Truth' is yet as it is supposed to be, it is "out there"!
But if that is no truth for you, welcome to here.

If you accept it, here is only this article. And at this Level we could begin analyzing the truth of the future, social dynamics, and ... who's winning. If you don't, then well, I just shot into my own leg; Big time!

Its that easy! And respectively difficult is it to take up the responsibility of making it right! Yea well, I guess everyone wants to make "it" right; And so once failure knocks - there yet are those that let it in and learn from it; And those that lock it - claiming that everything is OK. You might know the saying: A lot of bad comes from good intention.
Accept that you're a fool if you accept the wrong things; And that the majority does tell what wisdom is and what not; And you'll look up from the truth, wondering what people will say if you believed in it. Accept that this is just how the majority rolls - because well, what did we know? - and you'll discover, yea, eventually the truth comes together in pieces - and, yea, by learning: What do they know?
And so on and so forth.

There is a lot of ... "sensitive material" on this site - and going as far as to say that it are all things that you need to accept, well, kindof. Don't get me wrong! But 'the way there' - is it really going to be as bad - as when you accepted that it aren't things that can be good at any point?
I was writing that a solid concept is the problem of Utopia. Is it so that you need 'arguments' before you can accept such a thing? Or is there just a tendency - which will bring the arguments quicker than, well, actually reflecting upon a thing?
We can say "thinking" (to think) - but, I like the term 'reflection' a lot more. If you reflect, you'll take any information that comes to mind and you'll try to put it into the right context.
Its a long argument to deal with the case of concepts. We can accept that we need a strong concept, that we'll need a good plan (is a strong concept a good plan? (What do I mean by 'strong concept'?)) - but so; In first place: If we need a strong concept we need to think about it. If we think about it, we might need a lot of time. Hence we might start rushing. That strong concept is then imposed on all the others that'll have to accept that its good that way - and if we ignore anything else strongly enough; It may succeed. So, take Hitler for instance. At one point in his career he decided - we may say - that it is a good idea to burn all books that he deemed bad influence. People accepted it. Today we're kindof close, too close, to seeing the majority accept that all Journalism is bad. "Nightlark I hear ye hopping" - is a saying a friend of mine used to say whenever something that was kindof obvious - conspiracy theory wise - seemed to be confirmed by what is happening. Is it just an appearance? Well, I guess its better this way because I don't wanna bother deepening that.
It doesn't really matter what the words are that have you accept something; If I were you: I'd take a look at everything I accepted and think about that!

I guess I have a tendency to make it difficult for you to easily accept what I'm presenting. So, remove the 'appearance' thing and replace it by 'certainly' - and there you go! Easy to accept! "Ready to go!".
But what does it even mean - once pronounced? That whenever I say "Nightlark I hear ye hopping" that there is no way I could be mistaking something?
Or that whenever you are moved to thoughts they are automatically right, no matter how many people are moved to other ones?
I for instance - when we want to take it to the "things I want you to accept" line - want you to 'first' accept the things that come first; And one of those things is that if you don't know that you're inspired, don't pretend you are; Or at least don't show off as though you are!
How often did I shout into the Nightsky, arguing to God about how mistreated I felt? In hindsight, well, how stupid I was!
My change of mind there is at least enough truth for myself to tell me that - that we can in deed be wrong!

There's a lot of damage that we can do by accepting wrong stuff - or accepting right stuff out of order. Take Sex. Are all those Christians that advocate Chastity right? Doesn't this "open-minded" "post-Enlightenment" world just fuck itself up? And should incest really be a crime?
So - here you got controversy and an issue. How do you solve it without accusing one group of "stalling our progress"? Aaaah! See? It are those then that want a quick answer that are actually those stalling our progress!
For whats the point? Do we then wanan go out an burn everyone who doesn't follow suit to what "we" "in our great wisdom" bestowed upon you to accept as right?

If I were asked - "sexual freedom" is just as wrong as the opposite. How come? Because everything is wrong if built on the wrong ground/level. There are a lot of reasons why either side is wrong, but so, where is the truth of it?
And how many are doing the mistake to try answering that question through a doctrine? So, if the truth of it doesn't say either is right, but does say something totally different, can we not accept it?
Obviously: If I 'ripe enough' to ... whatever ... then, why should - could, how can it be wrong?
Or what should I say? "Don't do drugs Kids!"? I know that smoking is bad for your health, so yea, I should say that! But coffee is a drug too - and that's not an overstatement. Whats a drug? At least to me, well, drugs are 'psycho-active substances' or otherwise 'chemical compounds with "abilities"'. We can drink water or juice - no drug! But clearly alcohol and coffee are different! Coffee is a drug, we use it to 'push' ourselves; Just as the old indians used coke when going on a hunt. I mean, duh, why wouldn't we/they?
So whats the truth? The truth is that if you know what you're doing, you know what you are doing!

But so is the problem if you don't start to accept the 'first things' first; That you'll find yourself struggling about questions that'll just plop like bubbles if you take the more important things first! If you accept my words you'll accept that Incest is good which is bad so you can't accept it!? You though know that it isn't the gun that does bad things; Its the person using it! And if you accept that I'm just talking about myself, well, then you'll accept that; But whats the result, considering that its wrong?
I have time! I need to have time; Because there is no way my work does make any sense if I don't have the time you need to get your shits together!

If you accept that everything politics in this world stands and falls with acceptance, then you can accept that I just won the darn battle! The decisive one!
If you accept that the only thing that matters is the Truth, well, then you can accept that I already won it years ago! Sortof. Well, technically at least - which means as much as: However it makes sense to you!

So - you don't need anything more; If you accept that! At some point there will be an end to what I can write - as a matter of things that truely matter. If you can't accept that, then, the time will have come and you would miss it!
So - once you're for instance at the point where I write about 'Enlightened Satanism' - I'm already kind of there, way beyond the things you'll ever come to see; And that is technically even before we're even close to Zion!

In simple: I don't want you to accept anything about what comes through Unification - like 'Enlightened Satanism' - once taking Unification out of the picture! You however have to understand that what comes from Unification has to be accepted as coming from Unification - yea, ... that simple!