My Scientific Model of the Universe (Raw Script) - Black Holes
Preface:
I am not an Authority in this Field of Science! (Not Yet at least! and if - then however definitely not from a Mathematical perspective). Basically, well, this is the start of something - which begins how my journey into the Gospel began. I had a lot of stuff on my mind and in order to "not go crazy" I had to write them things down.
I have previously written the one or the other thing -- but that was different. Anyway - there is what I've had as 'the Double Bang Theory' - and simply theories and schemings alike that are simply reflections about impressions. The Double-Bang Theory is different in that the impression in question has occured in the form of a "Plastic Inspiration" - maybe a "Hallucination" - to again say: Its more fiction than science. But I also know the one or the other 'Fact' - and where both meet I somehow have to get things sorted out.
What is a Black Hole?
Anomaly - Life
My idea - it might be wrong but serves me as 'oppinion' to so investigate into a certain direction - is that a Black Hole is one of many 'possible Anomalies' - whereby the idea of 'Anomaly' is that it is not a simple Physical Model that sustains it. Like 'Life' or 'Organisms' (Bio-Organisation) would be an Anomaly for instance. The 'Anomaly' therein is found within the 'Advanced Organization'. Although a Genome is a 'Factually Physical Object' it transcends its 'Raw Physical Capabilities' within the Organization to an Organism and finally the 'inclusion of' or 'Symbiosis with' a consciousness.
Anomaly - Physics
As 'Factually Physical' I would describe the simple issue of Causality. For Causality to be a thing there needs to be something it can involve. Looking at a Pool Table there is no causality without Balls. Throwing one Ball on the Table there can be causality due to the Tables limits. Throwing two Balls on the Table that causality is further implying the two Balls in reference to each other.
The Causality of Physics is however much more complex than just balls on a Pool Table. This should be apparent within the realm of Chemistry - whereby - Chemistry can be accounted for its own individual Anomaly.
Magnetism is a good way to implement a raw understanding of our Science. People - or somebody - invented the Compass. The Compass works due to the causality of metal within the Magnetosphere of our Planet. From this 'perceived' effect we could deduce 'Magnetism' as a Cause to the effect. 'Magnetism' is a fact. It can be measured, it can be produced and in all that it follows certain rules. So is science about figuring those rules. These rules are thereby factors within the Causality of Physics.
Gravity and Light
One idea of a Black Hole were that it simply is a very dense area of Mass, so dense that its total Gravity even swallows light to the point that it turns out Black. Einstein however formulated that Light is Mass-Less, so is the Speed of Light formulated as the Highest Speed Possible. In this sense Light cannot be swallowed by a Black Hole if the Black Hole is simply: Enough Mass to do so - because there isn't enough Mass for doing so. The one way is to say that Einstein was Wrong, that Light has Mass, and the other is to think about Crumbled Space.
Einstein is thought to be right because his formula: E=mc[square] perceives the Speed of Light (c) as a constant of the Universe. It thereby relates to Mass (m) as factor by which Energy and Mass can be transformed into one another. So does mass equal energy/(c[square]) and because movement is energy, a compound of given mass cannot move faster than its mass permits. So is the only thing that can move at Lightspeed something that is mass-less. But 0*c[square]=0. So, I don't think it is as easy as that!
I also don't understand how this formula is being applied. Thinking of the Nuke, or Nuclear Power, where it is said to be the base of how it works, I don't understand the conversion because no Mass is being transformed into energy per se. The Nucleus is being split apart - this causes movement of the individual particles and this movement hits other nuclei so that a chain-reaction occurs. So I recount: A certain force holds the Nucleus of an Atom together. Once the nucleus is being broken apart, this Force changes from being 'Mass' into being 'Energy' - sotospeak. So the problem: If this is true, the Protons and Neutrons aren't mass at all!
However does this Energy so move the Particles - while Energy to us finally is about harvesting that movement to for instance power a Dynamo. The more Matter the Force has to carry, that would be a simple suggestion, the slower the Movement turns out to be. In that sense Light as Mass-Less were pure Energy.
Gravity finally is the Force that is told to attract Mass whereby Mass is finally a "product" of the Higgs Boson. The Nucleus of an Atom isn't simply Protons and Neutrons in that sense, but they furthermore are composed of Quarks - and the easy way on is to say that these are a mix of different Bosons where the Higgs Bosons contribute Mass. Gravity attracts the Higgs, the Higgs are tied to the Rest and so is Mass being attracted by Gravity.
What I'm trying to get to at this point is a perception of how Energy distributes within Matter. The Keyword on my mind now is 'Momentum'. The Heavier an Object, the longer it takes to move it. Also does it take more energy to move a heavy object than to move a light one. So does it cost "energy" to move an object, while the object thereby is a compound of Particles and each different Particle has a different requirement to be moved. Within a Compound of Mass we can further simply speak of two aspects. The one is the Particles "cost", the other is its ties to the others. So, applying "power" to a single atom will make it attempt to move. This will however have to influene all the other Atoms around. Once however applying power fast enough, it has no time to influence other particles while the power so attempts to break the Atom out of its environment. So we can say that each compound of Matter has its own inherant Energy. This Energy provides its stability. To punch a hole into a Wall, the power has to be strong enough to move all Atoms within the supposed hole out of their position. Otherwise the inherant force of that matter will recoil and so is that.
Effectively is this already a good Moment to talk of Qi. What does it do?
However, being more detailed than that does reach into areas I have little to no clue of. What matters is: What works, works. Gravity is deducively the Force that attracts Material compounds. It takes more force to lift a heavy object than a light one. This we so add to the context of a Compounds inherant Energy - while this Energy at first describes the Compounds '"Quantity"'. Here we dip into Quantum Physics for short.
Within my Approach on QP I take Matter on Quantum Level as a Quantity of Potentials. So is a Compound described for once by the factually present particles that in their whole are tied to each other indirectly. A particle directly links to its immediate surround and so forth until all is one Object. The strength by which a Particle is tied to its next describes its potential of being there. A "Quantity" - in terms of an Object or Compound - is the Mass of Particles that are Potentially sticking together. So does a particle also - in the inverted sense - have a Potential of being loosened from that Quantity. This at first or for so far is just the same as the talk of Energy in the previous; Simply using different terms. Here Energy applies as a factor that exchanges with this potential. If a 'Quantity' is a physical thing isn't the issue - by the way. It simply helps ... "Quantifying" things.
The potential of a particle to move is relative to the energy applied, here 'Energy' would at first be labeled as struggle between two potentials. As I push against a wall, my hand seeks to occupy the space of the wall at first. The Energy I put into my pushing increases the potential of it doing so. Once that happens however, the potential of the wall got broken. Re-visiting the Qi question - a thing we may wonder is how much 'Willpower' is a matter - or how Willpower relates to the Matter. If I ignore pain, so the question, can I thereby increase my potential to crack the wall?
Each particle is furthermore attracted by Gravity for as long as it holds Mass. Wondering about Light we can observe that Light is at least in one thing different: It moves - by default. Whether there is a 'non-moving' Light, well, like "Light Dust", that would be a question. Otherwise: What happened if Light got stopped?
Because every Mass-particle of a Quantity is attracted, its general potential of being attracted rises. This would allow us to describe Gravity as a Quantum Physical Mechanism where Matter is treated via its "Mass Potential". If we wanted to treat it as Anomaly, we could from this point formulate something factually physical: So, once a Quantity enters the space between two Massive Compounds it is attracted into both directions and thus it bears a certain potential to find itself in somewhere in between. That is something that 'might' seem like an Anomaly - in that regard - but actually isn't.
Otherwise is weight however simply the combined energy that an attracted Quantity produces in comparison to a hypothetical barrier that tries to hold it.
In the Cosmos Gravity however is a simple thing. We might say that Mass holds a general default potential to attract Mass. Now, how this looks in detail isn't my thing here.
Cumbled Space
The idea is that a Black Hole is born from Stars that Crumbled simply due to the Mass of the Star that prevented the particles to escape. So in the center enough Gravity occured to pull in the next closest Particles that would otherwise Escape the Super-Nova, that again increased the Gravitational Pull of the compound so that more and more got sucked in until it just succumbed under its own Mass into a Black Hole.
A question I have is: How does crumbled space work in relation to Gravity? If Crumbled Space does have a similar effect to Gravity - so that Light is changed in its direction of flight as though it were attracted by Gravity - it has to alter every Particles way accordingly.
Then, what is Crumbled Space? I have a theory:
Each Particle occupies a given Volume of Space and Dense Matter is beyond a certain grade the 'diffused potential' of a particle to be at a given point in space. Here is where "Potentials" in Quantum Physical terms begin to matter. Thereby next to Quantity there is Volume. Usually a Quantity occupies a given space, and once enough pressure is applied without an exit for given particles the Quantity is being squashed. The classic Model of Physics suggests that Matter cannot be squashed beyond its factual Particle-Volume. Quantum Physics Suggests that Matter can even be squashed down to the space of a single particle - no matter how much there is. Taking an Orb in the size of a Football field and two Soccer Balls - their relation is simple. While the potential of a Ball to be at a certain point on that field is small, their potential of being 'solid' is - ignoring all possible bollocks - 100% ->. The smaller the orb becomes, the larger the potential for a ball to be at a certain point. If the sphere is smaller than their minimum required Volume things change. Now there is the struggle that at first squishes the balls until they burst and what remains is the matter the balls were made of. If we shrink the sphere further there is a next limit which is the 'effective' Volume (between spheres theres always going to be some void) of the matter. Here each particle is still at 100%. Now however, shrinking the sphere furthermore, the potentials go below that. Because a particle would seek a 100% status, a tiny gap in the containment would have particles break out until the Quantity is balanced. Anyway - what happens if the Stability of a Particle reaches 0%? That is technically impossible because a particle that is there has to be there - somewhere. But if two particles occupy the same spot, well.
What is space then? Or, when are two particles on the same spot? The only way to mathematically resolve this is to take a Hypothetical Unit at first - the Resolution of Space - and to issue that two particles cannot move closer to each other than that. If it however yet were to happen, space is crumbling.
While there is a law that prevents two particles from occupying the same spot, and another law that determines the consequences if they yet interfere, the same law can still be in-tact for the 'Euclidic Space' - so - we take a Grid and on two nodes there is a particle. We draw a circle with the diameter of the grids resolution and that is stable. We say that the minimum is a tenth of that resolution and so we draw that grid where now both circles overlap. If we put them even closer - so beyond the minimum - the particles stay at the same 'relative' distance while space itself is crumbled - while the interactions between the different particles remains as though space were still in-tact, eventually. It can however not be just that easy because the crumbling will also follow individual rules. What would Mathematically matter is the scaling of the smallest cell - which in turn yields a gap. Or, where space is crumbled 'inward' - somewhere there have to be points where space is 'stretched'. Theoretically.
So would there be a barrier - while once so space is crumbled it crumbles within a volume. At first there is the outer radius which is where space is being stretched, followed by a second radius where space is getting squished. Now can we from there-on formulate eventualities like what happens with Matter outside of the inner 'normal-space' radius and what happens with matter within the 'squished' space?
If - so the idea - there is more matter than "works" inside of the squished space some strange dynamics would be the result. If it does all "fit inside" ... well ... we may have to yet wonder what rules apply - like - if there is a non-relative Level on which particles interact that so would eventually prevent particles from entering.
Perhaps, and that is my fundamental oppinion, the crumbling of space doesn't happen dynamically - so - a certain force at first crumbles space to a given degree and space then remains in that crumbled state - so - it crumbles 'step-wise'. So it can be possible to Mathematically retreive a scale that further relates to the Diameter of the Atmosphere.
A 'non-relative' Level of interaction would for instance be Mass. Then Mass wouldn't shrink within the crumbled space - while the question whether Gravity effects Matter in the relativistic or the absolute space would remain.
White and Black Holes
Black Holes are to crumle space quite severly should they ever come to effectively assimilate Light. Wondering about what happens with that Light, I have to wonder whether or not Light does also occupy space. If, then Light could at all "stall" the capacity of an object - or in turn - for a simple start: What happens?
Talking of Light in the cosmos we at first know the two basic sources: Radiation and Reflection. Reflection comes as what we know within our visible scope, Radiation is the source of Light as we know them well. A Black Hole in first suggests that there is Matter somewhere inside - so Light moves in, hits an obstacle, and so it would reflect of its surface and come out again. Because that is not the case, something is missing.
To understand it - we can issue that space could be crumbled to a Loop. Light that somehow falls into that loop does constantly loop around. Objectively that isn't logical to occur, because at first space would just crumble in terms of scale. If we added a whirl, somehow there would yet be a straight line through it. So the point that crumbled space would be potentially invisible, or might, could be. As we speak of those 'Lenses' - Galaxies diverting the Light to a point that magnifies whatever is behind it, we have to speak of Absolute Space nontheless where once Light enters crumbled space it so changes direction, moving along the relative space but once it exits it yet maintains a changed direction.
Uhm, ... well! With those few senses I got left I can gather: If Space is denser in the center and thus stretched in the outer spheres, ...
However deducing that if there is something to this model, then a) is crumbled space not a seamless transition - or - whatever. Also would a Galactic Core rather be "Blown Space" - while b) - it might be that Light has a certain resistence to crumbled space. In terms of Quantum Physics that would make sense as Light once regarded as wave isn't (or doesn't have to be) literally influenced by space - and furthermore: were space an absolute thing we wouldn't have a way of measuring its crumbling. What so makes Light being influenced and how is an individual scope of laws. In that sense however, these laws might even cause the inverted reality to be the case, so:
In which case the crumbled space takes effect 'after' the Light entered the scope, thus altering its absolute orientation - and so forth - which would finally also feature Light Speed another way, so, more Philosophically this time as wondering why Light Speed is not infinite. In this way does the crumbling of space have a 'continous effect' on Light within so that it is constantly changing its absolute direction and hence somehow subject to a effect similar to Gravity. In this sense a Black Hole would be an immense crumbling that does lock Light in.
It is however now extremely complicated for me to get to a green spot. Resolving the issue about 'the Anomaly' I have to settle on the idea that the matter of crumbled space is Anomaly enough behind it. Both anomalies bear the potential to have something like an outer rim where matter would prefer to reside. The Blown outline around Squished Space would "exagerate" the influence of matter and thus working like a Natural barrier, while the Squished outline around blown space would do so too. Each thereby based on different parameters. Matter arriving at a Blown Spot - thus a squished horizon - would at first find obstacles in its own Quantity while whatever makes it beyond is less likely to - so on a thin setup - interact. The object is more likely to become solid, while, how particles behave within blown space would be a thing worth knowing.
Within squished space Gravity can be considered in a higher scale - so effectively particles could be torn apart entering the Horizon while so after all creating a pseudo-dense field that - so to my understanding - would resemble what we think of a Black Hole.
So we can skip the crap and call the other thing a White Hole and in case I got something twisted - well.
I am however sure that there is a sophisticated backing to what I think here - whether it is to support it or not - but - enlightening nontheless. This would however not be my duty - in which case its going to be less guessing and more fact.
Stardate 55291.02692