The Stupid I am ... is I ... who made it this way. I wouldn't regard myself a very good example, that's the gist of this. What I would regard myself to be is - a negative example - not negative as in good and evil or bad - but ... different. So, for instance there's this: Some people say good about others that they are honest and say what they think - I in order do not tend to do so publically - or uhm. I do so in my own way.

It so for instance happened today - that's how I found this way into the topic - that I saw this woman sitting down right "next" (diagonally in front) of me in the subway. She was from what I would or could tell in about - uhm - 60-ish years old - I would say ... while the smell would suggest that she's much older. When I say grave I don't mean 'vault', but - everyone who knows any specific "grandma" smell plus some dust on it - thats how she smelled. From her face she though would make it into the late 30s - also her fingers. But ... how could I say she's 60? Or 58? Or is she? 3-something? But then a look into her decolté revealed some very specific wrinkles, and also her face was covered with very deep, sharp ones. Then she had this totally odd haircut and these ugly eyebrows - but her eyes were like - boooom. She wore what would be like todays upcomming youths "retro" style - what for her would have been chic ... I don't know ... "when she was younger", which would have been ... long ago - it seemed. Then some sports shoes, jeans and some 'rugged' jacket - and in touch with her smartphone.
Whatever - while I had to think to myself what I think about her, I so for instance saw the reaction of what now a - cliché overdrawn "gay hairstylist" like -Fashionette- could react like - argummentatively and he would say that everything about her is horrible. 'No go'. But I just didn't know what to think at all - while that what so obviously glared into my eye, underline by the appearances, wouldn't come through my "mouth".

That may be good or it may be bad - but what matters is the perception of life. What is important? When is it? If it is someones work to reproduce a certain style - or 'pre-produce' in other cases - he would look that way and in order to persue it he needs the menthality to express what he or she has in mind. I however do not, and neither do I copy something that is too laborious for me to maintain - which does right away take me into the outer end of the outer end. So definitely without any direct touch to the circulation of things - that is where I am going the way around - the background - keeping it cool - well ... what is to say - as much as:

rocks

where I would come to elaborate in more detail how this stupidity comes into Light - in example of the philosophical becomming of Dudeism in reference to 'deisdeimonia' and 'theodizee'.

• Dudeism: A religion based on the concept of 'the Dude' from the movie 'the Big Lebowsky' within a quint-essential iconography and ideology that describes itself as primarily aligned to Daoism and the Philosophies of Epikur - and is described as the 'true Religion' in the sense that it has been around since ever, including that Jesus Christ himself is to be seen as a Prophet/Messenger of Dudeism.
• Deisdeimonia: The fear of God. In a sense the idea that man must serve a God ritualistically in order to calm his wrath - or the cognition of an allpowerfull God who could smack with a wink everything that existed to get smacked with a wink like that - that says that He says - and thus the obedience until His demand in case there should be any.
• Theodizee: The discussion or philosophy regarding "The justification of God" in the sense of pondering upon the existence of Evil/Bad/"Unhail" within the world.

When studying Dudeism one must also study Epikur. Epikur was a greek philosopher - and what else I could tell right now have I found on Wikipedia. This also vastly roughs up one heavy dayload of intellectual activity (plus excercise in the Goku vs. Superman example, ...). Living Dudeism now however is not right 1:1 Epikurism because else it were Epikurism - as a statement that can be objectively drawn. If not, it should be. But so would the question remain how a Dude would answer these questions Epikur was opposed with - especially when 'Dudeism' is not a fixed format for to be but within the quint-essential idea of 'the True religion' that binds everything together. Lets bother this suggestion deeper.

True Religion - vs - the Dude

True Religion: Hey Dude!
Dude: Hey Dude!

Over! Done!

Well, in the picture previously drawn - there is no fellony. The dude and true religion pass each other by because the idea is that they both exist in peace with each other. So there is the inherant conception of 'the Dude' as guiding figure - and - what would Jesus do? Jesus like Dude and Dude like Jesus - or as others might say: 'And you will be one with me as I am one with the Father'. This is a statement that clearly reflects the Daoistic root of Harmony and Existence - where Harmony is a fact, a solid figure, anything that exists does that because of a Harmony that resided within so that there could be anything other than Chaos.

There is a philosophy about a Macrocosm and a Microcosm I read about here: [http://daath.weebly.com/page1.html] :where the initial flash animation makes it quite visual how harmony and patterns resignate within each other. This is also a sight onto a site that would awaken something like a huge skepticism within me when trying to look deeper. But so is this also about Understanding and the Truth - while in the quint-essential harmonic 'residue' of this topic so far there would remain the quint-essential logic for undoing intellectual conflicts that don't need be.
In this sense -how can a solution be that simple?

This is where it continues in Part 2.

Dudeists apparently do Love to smoke weed as [this] article on dudespaper.com would suggest - thus - Dudeism is inevitably in some way Epikur on dope.

Epikur is named next to two other streams of Greek Philosophy - wherein the perception of matter, the meaning of the Gods and the codex of well-thought behavior were of importance. There Epikur in his own way represents the idea that a joyful living is the way to go. Within individual meanings of Life and Death a certain emphasis on the rationality that reveals itself when trying to follow the inner childish impulses that give joy, while so however with age comming to guide them - or as reason permutates within them like an anchor yet also like a ship - or more so: Forward Thrusters.
It is to fight against lustruous desires - but not the joy in living.
Practically Joys are there sorted into three categories: 1. eating, drinking and protection from cold - 2. Things that are in doubt - and 3. Luxuries including Unreason.

The point is that therein are profound elementals that I can accept, even so to the point that I have wanted to write this all to say: That I can basically give a flying sh**t about what you believe in - I mean - that for the time where there is nothing else, anything else would do - saying that there are ways for whatever you would believe in 'virtually' or 'explicitly' - the reason is that what you can take into your conceptual ark-struct of reality strengthens it - no matter the source. That then is Gnosis as I mean it.
Yet now suggestively taken that we so would explicitly take foot on the indicated sources - Merchandise not included - there is the question regarding Deisdeimonia, for instance, in contrast to the old delivered God of the Jews and the Relationship to Christ from the behalf of someone who does believe in Jesus Christ as well - like I do.

Now do I have an oppinion regarding Deisdeimonia however - while more to the point - I find the point to make in my head because I know two oppinions that I set in contrast to each other. The thing itself and two oppinions thereby go together as three ... sounds alright. In context to this specific 'concern' that might arise within me to express my idea, I find that cicero once wrote in reflection: 'without fearing them, yet having the right perception of them', whereby the perception is that what determines existence, the here, the not being concerned about what is beyond (so that evidently when asked about that there might be nonsense, it wasn't his metiere - in my oppinion) - so that when with death perception ends, that what matters to value life itself is that what has been done within the passed time ... evidently. If there is nothing else to come but a certain end, that what lies between is so the more valuable.

What Dope adds to all this is that there is a sophisticated cultural manifesto - as via living - in response to how this time is being filled. So what I do right here is another manifesto of cultural activity (of a Pothead) - and now you think that I think that I am great - or isn't it? Maybe the partis split and go apart - most likely it would. So get the point: a Cultural Manifesto as used in here is born from the context of cultural activity within recordings for times far ahead. That does not suggest that all would survive forever.

Also researching Theodizee leads to similar out-points where all the different oppinions are noted.

So the point to the end is that there are many different oppinions that all point different ways - and so community is born where people share the same oppinion, believe in the same thing, so that there is one way. Within a Theistic tense "a Dude" is a person that does maybe not know who or what God is, but he looks for a way to feel safe with what he supposes are the highest ideals. These "for a Dude" can only be simple - that is almost his requirement into the whole thing, and God once positively returning to that is like the confession into Dudeism. Whether now God is a Dude or not makes the entire question a little bit less mystery-bugged, because when it is alright being a Dude, bla-dee-bla, but when understanding in which ways God reflects Himself through the points - a Theistic Dude has a framework to himself wherein he may become one with the Light side. Or within the classic twist of polarity, at the point of its 'mergence', where the two opposites are united from within one thing - the Summit or what is known as 'Taiji'. Taiji and Wuji are 'limitations' of the Universal Origin that is beyond comprehension - that which simplified put is greater than anything we can ever comprehend - for that wherein that is wherein we are - must in deed be greater than us, for however we fade and layer it - that wherein we are is fixed reality, maybe best experienced when cold.
Taiji is the next. There is the 'new' symbol and the 'old' symbol. The new 'Taijitu; is that which is known far and wide -

left:old | right: new

The question remains: How do two genomes produce a variety within an individual reproduction cycle - if they are so unique that we can be identified by them? What is the proccess of individualistic birth?

Once 'born' we speak of our 'comming into life', where classically we draw the fertilization process on the one, and ask the question for the soul on the other, but essentially speak of the spark of intellect within this composition. What however happens within Life is a wonder. The DNA somehow finds a way to organize a certain biological structure around itself that within itself is capable of operating complicated tasks. In essence can life thereby be described via Growth as base-vector - it yields from its environment what it needs to survive and capitalizes on any surplus that is available.
The Human would however yield a slightly different 'charge' as the Human is forced into Growth. The Growing of the Emrbyo follows tactical rules - basically the progress of the DNA within a fertile environment to a means end where we are 'awakening' and then have to learn while we still must be fed by the breast while all we know is that something is uncomfortable, maybe so therein lies even the fear of death.

Now - I hereby differentiate 'life' as from that what we are. Life in itself is the entire working mechanism of biology, which so is what the human individual inherits within this existence as plattform. We are 'individualistic' or so called 'Entities' which exist as independent compound within reality. This so corresponds to the classic biological processes our body needs to operate or be operated - while that what we are is so that what exists within this shell that we so call life here.

Here the old Taijitu
can be reflected like the core of the own self, the final internal peace - the wholeness of the own mind within the shape of its own self, the psychic base of the independence in itself - Existence of the own perception at least. So, that is the water wherein we exist. Now is it evident however that Mind and Body so do at one point connect - at some point, whereby 'point' here is Relative, point means that there is one perfect circumference that separates Mind from Body - where the one ends and the other begins individually - there happens the interaction between the two.


Interaction between DNA and Environment would physically make sense once looking at it from a Quantum Mechanical standpoint. The Quantum Mechanical "Environment" is wherein movement and state of the different compounds is founded. Although Gravity was quite a problem to figure in for some time, there are still evident parameters in play. One could suggest that it is an 'intimate influence' - alias - an influence from another physical plane of validity, but where things mingle and mix and build a whole such differences are only relative.
In this manner psyche would so hold its own 'Quantum Mechanical Attractors', while evidently that process or foundation already begins within the body. Here Life would exist within the DNA which in this sense is the Genome Interpreter Field - Life - that now organizes the Body. The Body however is a unit beyond the multiplex of its own, wherein each cell contains a DNA string. Thus we may suggest that a Biological Compound grows with its bio-mass, thus as the Molecule grows to an Organism, the Organism is the Entity and not the Molecule any longer.

In our case our Psyche inherits the body, which means that the Body is ours to control. It provides us with senses and a feeling of impact that teaches us the pleasure and the pain of reality, and as we learn to control our body we do more and more take it over.
Thus we may assume that we are in-deed born into this world, individually growing in mass maybe starting with a single Molecule of DNA. Here the Body-Life and the Mind-Life become what we know - while at least once the body can no longer support life we are dead, or, our Entity has decoupled.
Thereby I wonder if it may be true that the DNA is to some point a product of this process, where now the individual has its own 'Quantum DNA' that writes itself into the Body DNA.


in expansion to the concept of Energy


Is it provided by two sources I know/heard of that we may think of some essential power. One is mentioned along the taijitu article (german) on wikipedia, the other is Arthur Shopenhauer. Schopenhauer describes it as 'will', the Chinese Guy as 'Li'. The internal impulse that resides within a 'basic particle'. Within our Dimension the factor stands that what we may describe as 'Basic Individualistic Particles' are individually large or small.

Tai Chi (alias Taijiquan) for instance yields a great intellectual Harmony with this subject, so why should I not adopt it? If it doesn't interest you, well enough - but although I am a Christian I have no reason not to experience that which another culture cherishes so much. It is my hope, in all this, that the reader eventually finds his way to God, that is what this is all about.

When compared to a Video Game for instance, World of Warcraft in specific, I mean nothing to you - where the idea of 'the one' naturally means that he has to run around like in those quests where one has to push a button, see a progress bar and some fiddly animations, and an algorythm describes the amount of people that have hooked up onto the story.
But in this sense I have to directly reflect that I furthermore deflect you towards God, where I am no perfect example - but - possibly as example for 'what' is still within the range of OK. God is a Greater Life - again - so through Christ we will be united within the Father - and that is what this Unification/Enlightenment is about that I have to show.

Now it is evident that I would have no way to ever declare these things to you, were it not for that 'Seal of the One' that adds weight to my position. It is thereby in deed certainly no story that is without alternate explenations - possibly a bit odd, where the best way to describe just how odd would be to pronounce the movie 'the 9th Gate', but, without the woman, kindof. Such a small dose of it all, for sooner or later the movie would pop up anyway/on-top-of-that; And I'm not entirely secret about it either - however - but so strong. What matters though is that which remains real in the end, where naturally the way by which something is presented should be irrelevant. What matters to the text-book of how to measure and scale it is 1- the Testimony, which corresponds to the Source, while the next logical bit is introduced within the 9th Seal - or the Gate into a greater union with God. And 2- that something is there to measure, so, that the 9th Seal in this is a basic concept subject to what I regard the basic testimony regarding the Way that God would be giving to the individual at the moment and time it occurs.

'Until Then', you may either pass by here or do something else, it is entirely up to you - but keep it Straight and don't forget that in your world the one and only person that knows God best is yourself. And yet, that is exactly why it is written about the new Covenant that nobody will teach the other the ways of the Lord, at least I see a real certain point in it, because we know that there is no point in arguing who finally does after all know Him the best. Thats the Point

How can a Solution be that simple? How simple?

What is simple?

We have many different ways and each has a Truth of its own - and if we understand how to yield the fruit without eating the branch it is attached to, then we have a thing going. So there is that large sea of controvery where now everybody fights for survival, while, this survival is not a physical one - it is an intellectual and ideological one.

So for instance does it come to my mind how it is written:

Isaiah - CHAPTER 14


1 For the LORD will have mercy on Jacob, and will yet choose Israel, and set them in their own land: and the strangers shall be joined with them, and they shall cleave to the house of Jacob.
2 And the people shall take them, and bring them to their place: and the house of Israel shall possess them in the land of the LORD for servants and handmaids: and they shall take them captives, whose captives they were; and they shall rule over their oppressors.
3 And it shall come to pass in the day that the LORD shall give thee rest from thy sorrow, and from thy fear, and from the hard bondage wherein thou wast made to serve,


4 That thou shalt take up this proverb against the king of Babylon, and say, How hath the oppressor ceased! the golden city ceased!
5 The LORD hath broken the staff of the wicked, [and] the sceptre of the rulers.
6 He who smote the people in wrath with a continual stroke, he that ruled the nations in anger, is persecuted, [and] none hindereth.
7 The whole earth is at rest, [and] is quiet: they break forth into singing.
8 Yea, the fir trees rejoice at thee, [and] the cedars of Lebanon, [saying], Since thou art laid down, no feller is come up against us.
9 Hell from beneath is moved for thee to meet [thee] at thy coming: it stirreth up the dead for thee, [even] all the chief ones of the earth; it hath raised up from their thrones all the kings of the nations.
10 All they shall speak and say unto thee, Art thou also become weak as we? art thou become like unto us?
11 Thy pomp is brought down to the grave, [and] the noise of thy viols: the worm is spread under thee, and the worms cover thee.
12 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! [how] art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!
13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.
15 Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit.
16 They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, [and] consider thee, [saying, Is] this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms;
17 [That] made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; [that] opened not the house of his prisoners?
18 All the kings of the nations, [even] all of them, lie in glory, every one in his own house.
19 But thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch, [and as] the raiment of those that are slain, thrust through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcase trodden under feet.
20 Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, [and] slain thy people: the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned.
21 Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities.
22 For I will rise up against them, saith the LORD of hosts, and cut off from Babylon the name, and remnant, and son, and nephew, saith the LORD.
23 I will also make it a possession for the bittern, and pools of water: and I will sweep it with the besom of destruction, saith the LORD of hosts.


24 The LORD of hosts hath sworn, saying, Surely as I have thought, so shall it come to pass; and as I have purposed, [so] shall it stand:
25 That I will break the Assyrian in my land, and upon my mountains tread him under foot: then shall his yoke depart from off them, and his burden depart from off their shoulders.
26 This [is] the purpose that is purposed upon the whole earth: and this [is] the hand that is stretched out upon all the nations.
27 For the LORD of hosts hath purposed, and who shall disannul [it]? and his hand [is] stretched out, and who shall turn it back?
28 In the year that king Ahaz died was this burden.


29 Rejoice not thou, whole Palestina, because the rod of him that smote thee is broken: for out of the serpent's root shall come forth a cockatrice, and his fruit [shall be] a fiery flying serpent.
30 And the firstborn of the poor shall feed, and the needy shall lie down in safety: and I will kill thy root with famine, and he shall slay thy remnant.
31 Howl, O gate; cry, O city; thou, whole Palestina, [art] dissolved: for there shall come from the north a smoke, and none [shall be] alone in his appointed times.
32 What shall [one] then answer the messengers of the nation? That the LORD hath founded Zion, and the poor of his people shall trust in it.

In these scenarios the factor 'God' is not one of a certain rule-set initially, those Rules are given with the Tabernacle to Israel as 'Covenant', furthermore known as 'the Old Covenant'. It was a Religion that suited its time; Within an area where wild tribes claimed the Name of their Gods to be the True ones. When reviewed as a bad it gets clear that the problem isn't the religion subject to what is believed - but a reflection of belonging that expresses itself within violence. This however isn't solidarily a problem of those that believe in Gods or God, it is generally a problem of ethenical differences - whereby some are individually defined ideals and others more in need to evolve to something greater yet, or to mingle into the whole sotospeak. In this case I right now would employ the: