I tried to understand the Truth so I could do something against the crookedness in our world that arises through false information that is believed in while the truth is basically not even hidden or a mystery. So - I wouldn't say that I had 'high' ambitions, I just ... well ... it seemed reasonable.
Well, eventually I stumbled upon this, then that and sooner or later I arrived at "this Mystery". How? What?
Right now I don't want to be telling too much about it, but the general stance is: Assuming that the new Testament is falsified and that the Apostles hid their knowledge for once to be revealed - we can look for a verification. What we need to be looking for or otherwise expect if we take the asumption for granted is however dependent on 'the Plan'. Either it is something we would stumble upon one day, another day we'd understand those things and once again hooray to science and Archaeology.
But ...
The other idea is that the knowledge is present but in riddles. Solving this riddles would be a matter of understanding them - while - reflecting upon the Nag Hammadi Codices for instance we might say that if those are that, which I propose, the issue is more complicated because they are what we now might compare to the more difficult or even impossible Sudokus as opposed to the easier, Indiana Jones esque wordplays.
An entry-level example in my oppinion is 'the Authoritative Teaching'. When read like its written we get into the classic cliche flesh is evil and so on and so forth mumbo jumbo - somehow. But once replacing the term 'to inherit' - in alignment to the similarity between the two ideas - by 'to have sexual intercourse/be f***ed by' (as in 'to receive'), which now makes more sense once describing processes between existent entities, the text gets an entirely new meaning of which we then might contend about regarding the obvious implications.
It can however be called round, done, finished, solved - even conclusive, reasonable, etc. - but what now on earth can make us say that it is the right interpretation? What is there to verify the idea? It isn't as simple as to spit an anti-sexual verse from the Bible because if you analyzed the Text properly you'd find that those issues are concerned therein so then as well.
The issue is that we will believe in what we "want" - which should say: "what we see is right" - but dealing now with Knowledge that somebody tried to convey - or philosophy someone wanted to share - it ... well ... it is still that simple because we can't essentially tell what we're dealing with; And that exactly is the point where we need to let go of all that which goes on in the world that would tell you this or that and to find out with God what you should regard the proper, the prepared, the righteous way ... if it exists.