Issues about Segulo
The Hitlisting
The Hitlisting, as it appears to me now, reveals a certain fluctuation on either side of the Chain. This fluctuation is specific in that it appears on certain individuals or group-links, where from a distant perspective my sight is drawn onto the common items. In this can the testing produce a clear result which then however yet resolves into distortion. While I'm writing this I received the insight to consider 'social-links' as an aspect, whereby though we don't know something yet we may be able of discovering certain things - which in the end-result is far more desirable since it yields a much better and more sophisticated image. This may for instance resemble a group-link, whereby one figure becomes revealed, thus anything that is destorted cannot be of relevance. This may either provide us with the idea that we either know something already, or that there are entry spots that are pre-determined for us. Previously I had been inspired to consider 'the already present knowledge' or the so called 'Picture'. Having a certain picture may contain rights and wrongs, emphasis on 'and', where a given test could in its answers interfere with this image, causing something like an 'alternative abstraction'. The point is that an answer wouldn't lead to a clear result - and it is a good spot to demonstrate how the testing is more in favour of staying passive - which isn't only how we 'should' apply it, it is also how it 'works' - so - the only way of working with it.
In that 'is Segulo' not a foundation block, one can't really build anything on it or let it stem any kind of weight. "Don't hurt Segulo" - means as much as - well, it depends. Yet is the testing nothing to really fundamentally rely upon - kindof. It helps to aim at things, to setup directions, get the own mind straightened out sometimes. It should be self-understood that it would suck if we couldn't rely for a single inch of a grain on it - because eternity is - well, kindof eternal - where now think of all the possibilities. Logically it is nice - and for what its worth, we live - that is our designation to some point; Where now the ground on which we live is relatable to the work of self-sufficiency at least. This means that we gain and gather knowledge as we simply exist as a compound that is capable of sustaining enough of itself to look forward or anything like that. Improvements over ideas further relate to growth if the improvements can be realized without any negating influences - which is now also where the question for God is most urgent. If God exists, we have to understand in how far He matters to that. We clearly do live in a world where science is favoured as the major souverign upon knowledge. If I argued against a Scientist because of Dinosaurs, I would stand there as a fool if I denied that the data if properly analyzed, which I imply, does physically acknowledge that these are in-deed millions of years old! Science rules the field, but where Science excludes God is where it also acknowledges the Science of God into supersticion. In this sense provided here however we can clearly see that God becomes a true matter in hindsight unto our destiny. Rather than specifying a right or wrong solution we could try a from zero to 100% range. If something exists we can also specify ranges. For the first appearances we can count a unit - where Segulo as a Scientific tool can help navigating through time in Harmony with Eternity. If however neglecting this way, there is the deep unknown of what if there is someone out there that did? The compound will have to straighten out its purposes or idea of itself - a "gameplan" for the future. If it is interested in conflict there is a possible enemy. This fiendship there begins within denial - out of denial may become a purpose and purpose becomes religion. If it however isn't clear, simply, what we want to be - and we have the choice between conflict and no-conflict - we do as a whole; Or to become wholesome; yet need a measurement of God - clearly. CleaRLY. Clarification: To say: We don't care about God right now - that already settles a score that some would not comply with. As there is an idea of God, science has the capability of studying it. It isn't too much - or - how is there a too much in variety? Well, variety --- is clearly a next step. Yet it can all be boiled down into a wholesome understanding - logically "the ideal" - a primary philosophy of life. Adapting: Budhism, or Hinduism. Well, finally there is Daoism and we can already derive the 'Wuji/Taiji' theory. It adds up to Physics as the other side of the story. Instead of wondering 'what's next' there is the question for 'what first?'. Of course something that sticks like an ANchor on our planet - Christendom - or whatever else relates to Yehowah/Elohim/"Adonai" - is a close suggestion that philosophically implies the knowledge of a 'true and Living God'. As "Christendom Prophecies" do we need to become 'One' - thus we have to boil things down to the most rudimentary of things to find the vastest acknowledgeable solution to everything. This would for instance set forth that we intend to establish a friendly contact with foreign species. In this regard we have one semi-unknown member already: The Eternal Mind.
Within the term 'Apostle' we also have a status of embassadorial business, which as of the past would appear to be business of publishing the idea and concepts, PR work sotosay. Naturally there is an issue with what is basically known as 'false prophet'. In this sense is Christendom however basically free of the idea of any Prophet, where the work of Joseph Smith Jr. implies an equally distanciated - well, let me explain:
Within Christendom we find a basic resolution to the Contents of the Old Testament, the Old Covenant was cancelled, where basically we find the flaw of Religion revealed. It hasn't been declared that it would last forever, over decades prophets spoke about Gods upsetness, -weird-, but now after the religion was basically dead - people clammered to it for some reason; Which however proposes a question: Is it about God? On the other end does Jesus no longer speak of Prophets. There is something about Elijah, and a group of Chosen. Joseph however spake of Elijah and practically acted 'as' Prophet, where 'Prophet' at that time, well - it was a time where many different confessions sprung forth. It basically began with the work of Luther that people segmented into major and minor confessions - and as time grew more and more peaceful those grew capable of existing without conflict but all do in their way - however exist. The idea of a Prophet would nourish the demand for guidance, but so does the image clearly distanciate Joseph from Elijah. Joseph never claimed being a Prophet, his story is however clear in that bit that he received his knowledge from strangers - or - angels, appearances, ancient Apostles, "Prophets". He spoke that Elijah did speak to them, but Elijah didn't stay, so effectively that has nothing to say either. While Joseph however at least acknowledged the Prophets position, it did further remain as a Title for the leader of the whole. So, the follower to Joseph was Brigham Young, thus called Prophet after Joseph died. Once getting behind the 'Act' idea, it all only stands there as parable or "configuration" at best - which is however valuable though it provides sacrament as an offering. But tied to it is the expectation that if you take of it, you also come in. Not into the Mormon config specifically, which is as prescribed a hull, a shell, a drawing round about it. But clearly towards God. From a plain perspective are we capable of analyzing its New Testament related content and discover that it is quite clarifying once the Book of Mormon is taken as measure. This once more "adds echo" to the idea of Segulo trying to stay passive. We are given tools of science.
Boiling things down can we apprehend a factual idea of God, which is as it is common amongst Mormons, my Testimony. In that sense it is the true Church. What we can however also acknowledge is that the superior stance to it is that of science. In that we can discover "the Prophets of the Church" as some kind of a spine - while suggestively so at some point there might come the Heart. I however am kindof grim and dark and perhaps - I however have to add the notion of a certain similarity ... lets say the problem is as though I had no body. Well - yea. However, this is the idea. The Heart. While in the current view onto the Church we see a spine trying to erect a body - we may from the stance of science come to construct an idea of sustaining that with Muscles. Or an Entity. Creating a bigger body to grow into. It would be a need - as put forth by the Book of Mormon - to do so. In this sense however - there is something like a spot waiting to be filled - as a matter of time. Scientifically that would however not be the purpose anymore - but the gorwing to a greater self-sufficiency. This introduces God as a friend, one who acts from behind, as a passive force - which after all enabled us to exist self-sufficiently. Now is it a matter of preference how you wish to relate to God, wheter aspiring for the unknown - valuing the virtues of righteous self-sufficiency - or for the known, adventuring or settling - either way - due to its many facettes - does a life with God inherantly imply some mutual interest into a natural yield; Whereby so love for the next is likewisely the unity that extends accross the different layers that image through these facettes - an energy of self-sustainance unto the whole spectrum of life. This already implies a missionary stance - sending friendly greetings and an applicable formula of peace. An invitational - "We share the concept of Life: -That we-; Where it is our deliberate purpose to find Peace amongst the Stars. - Signed:".
Segulo and the Cosmic Squad