Lamentative Contemplation
Hmph ... !!! Sometimes I do stumble upon these words and they seem to be things "ordinary" human beings value! What is: "Insightful"? I barely do understand! When I mean that I don't I rather mean that I do not comply to its logic. I maybe don't understand everything - but when I understand ... it may yet be bottomless nonsense that I'm looking at!
The star-filled sky is Insightful! Someone who looks at the bottom of an empty glass of Beer is Insightful! So, how can someone 'not' be Insightful? Even a Blind man has to see!
But, looking at the Stars, some are closer than others and it takes a lot to exactly tell which ones are closer and which ones further away. The 'how-to' of this matter is an insight and insightful in-deed; But the two sides of a coin (an ordinary one for Gods sakes!) won't change no matter how often you flip it around (yea yea, except something happens or you flip it around until one or both sides start to wear off - for Christs sakes, please!). But so I feel - as one might deduce - spammed with "Insightfulness" in the likes of ... "if you flip it often enough it might change". Well, sometimes I do speak nonsense like that myself, but, thats joking! Or 'insightful' yet once the proposed appearance is Bollocks!
An example? To hell with it!
If God: One Way - if another way: Bullshit!
So I say that I'm a whore - and Halleluyah for that! What it means is Bullshit considering that it means nothing - but once trying to answer just and exactly "those questions" - the answer is there, there right in front of your face! I mean, would I really need to whore myself out on the Streets to add reason to that expression of mine? Wouldn't it be insightful to realize that in the immensity of Eternal Existence the odds of this world are meaningless?
So, what would I do with all that time? Easy! I'd look for folks that wanna fuck and whore myself out before them. What a question!
How insightful - sarcasm on - to consider eternity in face of having issues relating to God and His Gospel!
Now we flip the coin and ask: What of this world? I'll say: We'll see! What the problem? "But this isn't enough" and "yet-a..." ... whats the problem? What in Gods Name is the fucking problem? Are you wondering or are you telling? If you're telling, then what is it that you are telling? If you're wondering: What is the fucking problem? "No need to be yelling" (I yelled, or would have) - and I'll say: "Ill fucking yell as much as I fucking want to and if you were not so mind-numbingly stupid I might not have to" or version 2: "You started it!". Version 3: "Let me complete my sentence!".
What sentence? That sentence I would be about to speak that responds to an actually made statement following to my questions.
I'll take a way around to start drawing a context that puts this nonsense into an accurate spotlight to possibly begin understanding the way I relate to this whole massacre of ideas and "thoughtfulness". Ish - wueh - alch - bueh - ahsii - bluae - *womit* - krp - hshp - ptui - wauh - uha - khap - khap - pfrrrt. For this purpose I'll draw me in a picture where I'm a heavenly bird, something humanoid between a griffin and a phoenix, something feminine, fine ... and blue feathers. So, Ill hop towards that well of water, a fountain, drink of it, and along comes someone - pukes right into it as I sit there drinking - attempts to make a roundhouse kick at me and thats it with my patience.
An intellectual discussion would follow the purpose of ending on a higher Level of knowledge than it started. Reflections follow the process of refinement and once the end is more stupid than the beginning, well, something went wrong and as I have a part to such discussions I would allow to have myself be criticised by me. As I have nobody to reflect with I can be proud and arrogant if thats what you call it as I go hopping along my way.
A problem with Religious bias is that it "has to aim at a certain goal" and a misconception with True Religion is that it - as it has to follow the goal of Truth - is in about the same. We are technically Biased in that we take certain things for granted - but thats the same with physics. Gravity for instance, whatever it may be, is taken for granted. There may be areas where it plays a minor role, but all in all is True simply True. Anything that defies the Logic of God is like in Physics something that defies the natural Laws. So it stands as 'insightful' that 'if' something would for instance just float around without a physical reason known - we'd say: There has to be a logical explenation before we'd say: Well, Gravity apparently didn't exist yet! Sorry Newton!
As I laugh (entertained) about what I wrote I also do so with a bit of reluctance, worrying that natural science could only become that successful because the Enemy thought that it'd help getting rid of Christians. That is also where those over-exagerated anti-theistic expressions from "the Field of Science" come from. I can understand Schroedingers Cat, but once the common crowd understands it as the reign of perception then I'm sorry if I can't appreciate it all that easily. Yet, once a fist comes flying your way you'd be better advised to understand causality rather than the reign of perception!
There is no word that means anything more than that what it means. The extended meaning comes together in context to other words. Can we all agree and settle on that?
So, I'll assure you that at the end of this Article I'm still going to be a Whore - so by the definition within the relevant context here. It is thereto now important to understand that as I begin by elaborating a context from wherein the matter is received - that there is a context being provided wherein the perceived term is being relevant. I'll avoid re-iterating on that since at first you might be better advised to see: Unless you know where that term has been 'drawn' you don't know the right context either. So, between those that know and those that don't is essentially some sort of a gap - the ones do know and the others are in need to know. So is it in the responsibility of those that do know to properly explain it and I'm quite sure that those explenations won't really lack in a significant thing. Because the 'original' writing is offline though, kindof, I'll give you the hint that the one that links to this is sufficient enough. So, naturally "out there" this writing here didn't help! Not at all! There is however a scope wherein so called intellectuals mean to push their agenda and here is something like a bump along the road that riding onto with high-speed (the metaphor for taking what they say as for granted) wouldn't be advisable. But look over there, a pink Elephant, warp, brand-new car - and what happened?
So, things that are being told shouldn't bypass corresponding questions. I have the right to question that which is being told to me! So, if things are being told, that much I can count together, then the corresponding question for me were: Is Sex really all that bad? So, the answer from me is: Obvious! Since you according to me will retain the right to question that, you shouldn't question the obviousness of the fact that I'm providing answers from my perspective, my belief, in the obviousness that I do. If that isn't obvious enough to you: Sex IS definitely as Good as it CAN be once it 'can' be 'that' good! Naturally - and that should be the common sense of things by now - I don't want to, need to, intend to and allow myself to argue or deduce or explain from me saying such things that I'm the Prophet! So, correspondingly there arguably is something like a gap. If you do read this from an angle of expectations that required me to explain therefrom how come I am the Prophet you so might end up stranded, wondering why you've read it to begin with. Why I even mentioned it. If you required yourself to believe from here on that I'm the prophet then go ahead - do so - but that nontheless will require you to take the Testimony seriously.
But if you set a crash-course for the testimony to collide with Sex issues, well, let me tell you that you're doing something wrong! The Testimony is one thing - it is 'the thing' - it is there for you should you finally be interested in comming towards God. This here is as much as saying something to the question of how Sex matters in regards of the Gospel and is therefore more because it is sometimes a bit of a complicated issue. Because people can disagree with me on that term backed up by the argument: That why - or 'because' - you may get the feeling that Indiana Jones in Raiders of the Lost Ark must have gotten at the end when being asked to pick a cup. So, certainly it will do you good if you settle your mind on something like a 'must be' way to go - but whether its the right one or not is still for God to tell you!
There something that may have gotten a bit too short of a detail is that what I preach is 'Gnostic' - not the old school but however so that there is no finite do this or that and we'll all be happy kind of thing beyond the measurements that are provided within the Doctrine and I should already be definitely more than tired of repeating this! So, I'll tell you: Everything you believe or deduce is WRONG! Period! Live with it!
While you don't have a solid foundation you're best advised to make up your mind every day anew - and sorry - its all just dumb! Its dumb! It is dumb! It is really literally quite dumb!
So, rather than seeing what I tell you here as an answer that I provide from my oppinion, take it as an answer that I provide from how my life turned - trying to provide that it turned in Gods will as I did want it to be that way. That solves all sorts of problems! Like - you want to disagree? Got what? Scripture? But what did you do to assure yourself in that its right? I've spent my lifetime on finding the answers! I've dedicated my existence to knowing what there is to be known! Wanna say that He guided me wrong? So, thanks!
Stardate 55291.56294
Contemplation
Why is it that from time to time I 'suffer the answer'? Why is it that I must hate my life by writing shit like this while my heart wants to do other things? Why do I carry myself onward to writing this nonsense? Why can I not just let it go, why can I not just have done the little I did and be happy about it? Why can I not return to what I enjoy doing?
I write things like this and it makes me hate people more and more. But so is it at the end of almost every writing - except I've from the beginning accepted that in the end people will believe anyway that I suck. Something is missing, convulated, not quite clear or whatever the hell! In this writing though - there is a coin with two sides. It has exactly: One, Two - sides. Still, no matter what, people will find a way to declare the bollocks of an expression that simple! So, what is the point? Is it the point that "they" are helping me to refine the quality of my article? If so, why are they not? Because of whatever! So, what kind of a help is someone that stops you from helping me in case you can't take it yourself any longer? None!
Next to the women, I'm asking all the Big Bulky 2 Meters tall and wide guys to add a bit more seriousness to this nonsense! I mean - hey! Yea, what do "You Guys" understand? You would understand how Proteins enter the Body and support the growth of certain things. You possibly are too dumb to follow the other guys highly advanced and uber-scientific reasoning and argumentation - but at some point I don't really get it either! Yes of course I do have to, but what I mean is more like: After trying to unscrew a screw I realized that there is no point to it.
I mean, I'm taking myself by the cliche of irresponsibility, women by the cliche of the motherly figure and now Terminators by the cliche of being intellectually underprivileged. And because that leaves the ordinary man standing outside - well - at this point they better just not stand in the way! I'm sorry! I'm not wanting this to go down the escalation highway anyway - so - yet! See, "Everything is Awesome!". The Antichrist though, not to be underestimated, has his tricks. I can barely help you against them because partially I can't help myself against them. So it begins with those that are arguing back and forth, bla bla, that once the argument settles against their favour they'll begin pulling their tricks. Step 1: Enter safety zone, be dominant, move people back into their boundaries. Here something like a general disrespect would need to indicate the need for someone else to intervene. Because here reason no longer counts the emotional entanglement starts to take effect. Now two are in need of help, yet so the question is: Whom is this show for? What is the point of a discussion like that? Those that stay passive will have to make a choice. They are the referee to this situation that can no longer be solved. If this doesn't help - physical intervention may be required. It twists around and all is bad ... so ... its always going to end: How?
Thus the question isn't how its going to 'end', but how its going to 'begin'. So the picture is zooming in on a decision, a corresponding movement and the consequence is opposition. The ordinary guy in that will gather around a working body - that is a vague but practical definition. They otherwise can be the water for the rest to swim in. Outside of that there are shepherds - or so told: Fishermen or (Traffic) Police that will join in and try to be spear and shield - trying to basically follow the common sense, swimming with the flow, thereby providing flow and thereby being the intellectual response to the outside. If they get attacked, then its better for them to have backup!
In that thing there is no 'alone' - which is human and relates to the habit of looking at others once having made a significant expression. Its like check and counter check. One who moves will need the affirmation of the rest to move along, and that in the end is a matter of the whole moving unified into a given direction. Once the compound is settled things will be different but not quite at all.
There - opposed to the Hypothetical Story of me overcomming myself and making my way to whatever target there is the story of how it would be written once this were to take place. It would be a Biblical story that is written about individuals and their perceptions, decisions, ideals - and as it to me is apparent that there is an enemy called: Confusion - in this story, will it so be the resolution that things will come to pass that are written to happen so that the story will be told like: That it came to pass that what was written in X:Y became fulfilled. So I'll for now no longer be invested into this topic.
I may though very well assume that I may have been wrong. But like the story goes that explains somehow how come that things took so long, the story goes that I was yet to write or find or conclude this or that - and thus it came to pass what is written in Isaiah where it says: And he will not rest until he established righteousness in the world. And as it is written that he will inch forward without any hope for his way to be defied - the answer is as simple as it gets: Somewhere ahead!
There, though I've written: We'll see - I can be rather sure that there will be nothing until there are enough individuals born of a kind that something will be - and what that something is so naturally depends on them people there! Outside of that I'll go by the tags: Untouchable, Gentle and Cleric! Peace!
Stardate 55291.56388